by scobienz » Sun Sep 29, 2019 9:18 pm
Harold wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2019 5:34 pm
What on earth does China have to do with the fact that the administrators of K440 represent their website to advertisers as being in compliance with the law when in fact they seem to be allowing users to unlawfully induce infringement of copyright?
I can’t speak for current management but when I ran things I openly told advertisers that the site was run for shit and giggles and was most certainly not to be taken seriously.
It worked. We had lots of advertisers then.
On one occasion I went to a meeting with a prospective advertiser thinking I might be able to get £100-120 a month from him. Instead he offered £400 a month without me even opening my mouth.
I signed him up and ran.
[quote=Harold post_id=986857 time=1569666851 user_id=37442]
What on earth does China have to do with the fact that the administrators of K440 represent their website to advertisers as being in compliance with the law when in fact they seem to be allowing users to unlawfully induce infringement of copyright?
[/quote]
I can’t speak for current management but when I ran things I openly told advertisers that the site was run for shit and giggles and was most certainly not to be taken seriously.
It worked. We had lots of advertisers then.
On one occasion I went to a meeting with a prospective advertiser thinking I might be able to get £100-120 a month from him. Instead he offered £400 a month without me even opening my mouth.
I signed him up and ran.